Sudan Crisis

The decentralized authorities have made a unified opposition front against the coup in Sudan. They have formulated cohesive agenda to deal with coup implications on the internal politics of Sudan.  Khartoum State Resistance Committees and revolutionaries hold a meeting. They have published the political charter and given a road map to resolve the issue of political crisis within Sudan. The two-year transition plans have been given to overhaul the political institutions and make them more democratic.  It includes grassroots-level initiatives to bring changes in the existing political system of Sudan. They have formulated a transitional constitution to transform the domestic political structure of the country.

The political groups have not been able to change their domestic political structure to strengthen Sudan and bring about stability within their country. The instability created an unstable economy and state apparatus has been used to develop surface-level changes. The empowerment of people is possible through infrastructure changes and building strong political institutions. The rivalries among groups within Sudan prevented the formulation of a coherent political front to counter any attempts to a coup and imposing policies that damage the political and social fabric in Sudan. The task for revolutionaries is to form a government by the political leadership to make unified state policies for Sudan.

Muzna Alhaj, a member of a resistance committee in Khartoum, has adopted the bottom-up approach to transforming their political structure into a democratic political structure. The changes are implemented at the grass-root level to enforce democratic practices for Sudan.  The demand of the people is to reform Sudan’s security and military systems to bring stability to Sudan. It includes the National Intelligence Service, the police, and the armed forces to ensure the protection from the external threats and civil war within Sudan among the rebel groups. The discontent in people led to unstable political situations within the country followed by a coup.

 The Juba Peace Agreement, signed in August 2020 to develop a coherent national framework to address the issues that have been remained unresolved in Sudan. The opposition groups blamed authorities that lead to the coup in October. The Juba peace agreement was signed to bring opposition groups to negotiate the differences and initiate the intra-Sudanese dialogue to bring stability through the radical approach and prevent any efforts to derail the process of the talks. The aim is to establish a stable political system within Sudan through the help of democratic leadership. The Juba agreement was signed to bring about political change in the politics of Sudan.     

The future of Sudan political unrest is not bleak efforts are been made to restrict the conflict and formulate a national civilian government and consolidate power among rebel groups. The historical facts of Sudan are kept in mind by the political powers to resolve their differences to formulate a government that has the representation of all the political groups within Sudan. They need to devise a formula to share the power among the political leadership and avoid a coup in Sudan. The issues can be addressed by forming a constitution that safeguards the rights of people and restores the political system in the country.      

https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2022/03/sudan-resistance-groups-lay-out-charter-democratic-transition#ixzz7N6sRiqHU